“It is incredible the quantity of good that may be done in a country by a single man who will make a business out of it…”
— Ben Franklin (1783)
I joined more than 300 people in the ballroom of the Drake Hotel in Chicago to celebrate Milton Friedman’s 100th birthday on Tuesday evening, July 31. I attended the dinner, sponsored by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, because “Milton,” as I called him, meant so much to me during the 20 years that I knew him. In fact, I perhaps was the last person to have lunch with him in 2006, only a few weeks before he died. He told me that he admired my book “The Making of Modern Economics.” He once said, “All histories of [economic] thought are BS — Before Skousen.” Not bad!
Mark Skousen having lunch with an unshaven Milton Friedman at his favorite restaurant in San Francisco in 2006. (Photo credit: Van Simmons)
I had a lot of fun at the dinner earlier this week when I circulated the photo below of Milton Friedman, along with George Stigler, his academic sidekick at University of Chicago, and John Kenneth Galbraith.
“All great economists are tall. There are two exceptions: John Kenneth Galbraith… and Milton Friedman.” — George Stigler
Rarely do we celebrate the lives of famous people years after they die. But Milton Friedman was a role model for how to get things done and how to change the world. The Economist magazine called him the most influential economist of the second half of the 20th century. He also certainly was a most serious opponent to Keynes and big government. His major book, “A Monetary History of the United States,” co-authored with Anna Schwartz (who died a few months ago), changed the way economists and historians view the Great Depression. Because of Friedman’s meticulous research, the biggest economic catastrophe in American history is now viewed as a failure of government policy, not due to the pursuit of free enterprise.
Two of Friedman’s popular books, “Capitalism and Freedom” and “Free to Choose,” remain in print. (I have the distinction of making a marginal contribution to the former book — I pointed out to Milton that there was no index at the end of “Capitalism and Freedom,” an omission that was rectified quickly in the next edition.)
Friedman wasn’t a quixotic academic tilting at windmills. Instead, he was someone who actually changed policy. He was a practical political economist. Patrick Byrne, the chairman of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, credited Friedman for creating the all-volunteer army and ending the draft. Byrne referred to the following story, retold here from Milton and Rose Friedman’s memoirs, “Two Lucky People.”
“In the course of his [General Westmoreland’s] testimony, he made the statement that he did not want to command an army of mercenaries,” Friedman wrote. “I [Milton Friedman] stopped him and said, ‘General, would you rather command an army of slaves?’ He drew himself up and said, ‘I don’t like to hear our patriotic draftees referred to as slaves.’ I replied, ‘I don’t like to hear our patriotic volunteers referred to as mercenaries.’ But I went on to say, ‘If they are mercenaries, then I, sir, am a mercenary professor, and you, sir, are a mercenary general; we are served by mercenary physicians, we use a mercenary lawyer, and we get our meat from a mercenary butcher.’ That was the last that we heard from the general about mercenaries.”
Robert Enlow, president of the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, shared a story about how Friedman’s influence continues to this day. Friedman and his wife decided in the late 1990s to focus on school choice (vouchers), a winnable line of action compared to, say, privatizing all the schools, going back to the gold standard, or abolishing the income tax. Friedman was famous for advocating “second-best” solutions, such as the flat tax, privatizing Social Security, and the negative income tax as an alternative to the welfare system.
Enlow recalled the remarkable advances made in state after state on the school choice issue. He pointed out that 18 states now offer some form of school choice. In the audience were quite a few people who were spearheading the school choice program in various states. Many of those school choice advocates were black Americans. For more information about school choice, go to http://www.edchoice.org/.
The keynote speaker at the dinner this week was Condoleezza Rice, former Secretary of State under the administration of President George W. Bush. She praised Friedman for helping to “change the course of history” and boldly declared, “School choice is a civil rights issue.” She said she was inspired by Milton and Rose Friedman and their “simple idea that free markets and free people will rule the world.” Rice recalled the history of the post-World War II era, from the deep pessimism of the cold war period to the optimism that emerged from the collapse of the Soviet Union. But Rice wisely avoided discussing the more recent contentious times of the Bush Doctrine (Iraq and Afghanistan wars), the huge deficits, and “No Child Left Behind” legislation, all of which the Friedmans opposed.
Secretary Rice recalled a conversation she had with Friedman in 1991. He asked her, “Did you ever think that the Soviet Union would fall?”
“No,” she replied.
“I did,” Friedman responded.
Milton was known as a fierce debater who had no peer. Yet, I thought I bested him once in the mid-1980s when the two of us went out to lunch at a conference in Laguna Beach, Calif. We talked about economic and political issues of the day, and we had a great time. At the end of the meal, I paid the restaurant bill for both of us and said triumphantly: “See, Milton, you are wrong. There is such a thing as a free lunch because I’m paying for yours!” But quick as a flash, Friedman replied: “Oh no, it was not a free lunch. I had to listen to you for two hours.”
I tell this story and several others, including the time I ripped up Milton Friedman’s $20 bill, in this tribute on my personal website.
You Blew It! Public Employees Don’t Pay Taxes
As a financial economist, I was amused when Emory University psychology professor Drew Westen recently claimed when he wrote online, “We’re smarter than conservatives.”
“Republicans defy basic math by arguing that you can cut deficits by throwing public employees out of work, which cuts the number of taxpayers (and hence reduces tax revenue)…,” Professor Westen asserted.
Prof. Westen may be good at math, but not accounting. The entire salary of all public employees comes from taxes; they just give some of it back in the form of withholding. His calculations include the loss of tax revenue when you end withholding of these fired public workers, but he forgets the other side of the ledger, the savings in gross taxes from not having to pay the gross salaries of these public workers. On net balance, there is considerable tax savings by laying off public workers.
I have written Prof. Westen to share my views, but have not received a reply.
Yours for peace, prosperity, and liberty, AEIOU,
Newsletter and trading services
• Today’s challenging market conditions require even more knowledge than ever for investors and traders like you to keep pace with the latest market intelligence to safeguard your portfolio and to profit from opportunities that only may be available for short periods of time. Join me at this year’s MoneyShow San Francisco, August 24-26, at the San Francisco Marriott Marquis to hear recommendations and advice about how best to profit in 2012 and beyond! Register FREE today by clicking here, by going to MarkSkousen.sanfranciscomoneyshow.com or by calling 1-800/970-4355 and mentioning priority code 027882.